47

47

Share this post

47
47
Trump vs. Boasberg: Judge Threatens Contempt Charges Over Defied Deportation Order

Trump vs. Boasberg: Judge Threatens Contempt Charges Over Defied Deportation Order

Judge Boasberg says he's found clear and convincing evidence that Trump officials defied a court order. Now the Justice Department—and the separation of powers—face a critical test.

Apr 17, 2025
∙ Paid
2

Share this post

47
47
Trump vs. Boasberg: Judge Threatens Contempt Charges Over Defied Deportation Order
2
Share
President Donald Trump and Federal Judge James Boasberg

47 is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, upgrade to paid today.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled on April 16 that there is probable cause to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt for violating a court order halting the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador.

Boasberg says the government must move swiftly to comply with the court’s order and potentially retrieve migrants who were deported in violation of it if it hopes to avoid criminal charges. (WSJ)

The decision intensifies ongoing tensions over the administration’s controversial immigration policies.

Background of the Case

In March, Judge Boasberg issued an injunction halting the deportation of individuals from Venezuela, particularly those linked to the criminal gang Tren de Aragua, to El Salvador.

Despite this ruling, deportation flights continued, landing in El Salvador on March 15. In his decision, Boasberg determined that the administration had "deliberately and gleefully" disregarded the court order, a move he described as a serious breach of judicial authority. (AP)

Meanwhile, White House Communications director Steven Cheung brushed the contempt case aside, saying on X:

“We plan to seek immediate appellate relief. The President is 100% committed to ensuring that terrorists and criminal illegal migrants are no longer a threat to Americans and their communities across the country.” (X)

Legal and Political Reactions

Upgrade to paid for deeper insights: Join our paid subscribers and learn more about the Justice Department’s next move, what legal scholars are saying, and how this situation continues to escalate tensions between the Judicial Branch and the White House.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to 47 to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 47
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share